MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2609293305 · doi:10.1093/sleepj/zsx050.1034

1035 EXPLORING DISRUPTED SLEEP IN A POPULATION OF OLDER ADULTS LIVING WITH HIV

2017· article· en· W2609293305 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J A Frain

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexMedicineGerontologySleep (system call)PopulationDepression (economics)CognitionPsychiatrySleep quality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over 1.2 million people in the United States are living with HIV, and more than half are 50 years of age and older. Disrupted sleep negatively impacts this aging population. Aging is known to alter circadian and thermoregulatory mechanisms essential to regulating the sleep cycle, and HIV itself may speed the aging process, contributing to earlier onset, and increased prevalence of disrupted sleep. Poor sleep adversely affects medication adherence, quality of life, and survival, and contributes to daytime sleepiness and fatigue. The purpose of this study was to assess determinants of cognitive function. This data is from a randomized controlled pilot study examining cognitive function in older adults with HIV. Twenty-four adults with HIV 50 years of age and older were recruited from an infectious disease clinic at a Midwestern University. Participants’ mean age was 56.2 (SD = 5.15), with 14.3 years of education (SD = 1.80). The majority were male (88%), African American (67%), and had been living with HIV for 19.88 years (SD = 8.14). Instruments included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Eighty-eight percent of study participants were classified as poor sleepers (PSQI Global Score >5). Two-thirds of participants reported sleep duration of less than 7 hours most nights over the last month. Nearly 60% experienced delayed sleep onset latency (>30 minutes to fall asleep). Sleep efficiency was also problematic with over half reporting sleep efficiency scores of <75% (total hours of sleep / total hours in bed). Global sleep scores were positively correlated with increased depressive symptoms (p = .001), as were the component scores of sleep quality (p = .001) and sleep disturbance (p = .017). Sleep duration had a positive significant correlation with cognitive function (p = .018). Sleep problems are negatively impacting a large segment of the older HIV population, and advances in HIV care have not included improved sleep for this aging population. Determining specific sleep issues adversely affecting this population is a necessary first step in developing non-pharmacological interventions designed to improve sleep.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207