Mary Di Michele - Integritatea Vorbirii Si Tacerii (Mary Di Michele - On the Integrity of Speech and Silence)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Romanian Abstract: primul poem al luminos Urgențe este un moment de cotitura al Mariei di Michele. Dupa cum sugereaza și titlul, acest poem marcheaza un punct de plecare pentru ea. Ea vine intr-un moment in care ea se indreapta catre nou subiect, precum și noi forme de scriere; intr-adevar, inceputurile unei astfel de schimbare sunt evidente chiar și in acest volum, in poemele din Chile, iar in poemele in proza. Astfel de lucrari formeaza o punte de legatura intre data și poezia lui di Michele și explorari ei actuale in proza. Mai mult preocuparea mea aici, cu toate acestea este faptul ca Primer marcheaza un punct de cotitura in explorarea formei confesional di Michele. Este in același timp cel mai sofisticat dintre poeziile sale confesionale ca un ramas bun de la forma in care ea a folosit-o. English Abstract: The Primer, the first poem of 'Luminous Emergencies,' is a watershed of Mary di Michele. As the title suggests, this poem marks a point of departure for her. It comes at a time when she is turning to new subject matter, and new forms of writing; indeed, the beginnings of such a shift are evident even in this volume, in the Chilean poems, and in the prose poems. Such works form a bridge between di Michele's poetry's date and her current explorations in prose. More my concern here, however is that Primer marks a turning point in di Michele's exploration of the confessional form. It is at once the most sophisticated of her confessional poems as a farewell to the form as she has used it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".