MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2609502880 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d58

The Green Bank Ammonia Survey: First Results of NH<sub>3</sub> Mapping of the Gould Belt

2017· article· en· W2609502880 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of AlbertaCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreen Bank TelescopeEmission spectrumAmmoniaSouthern HemisphereKinetic energyGalaxyNorthern HemisphereLine-of-sight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present an overview of the first data release (DR1) and first-look science from the Green Bank Ammonia Survey (GAS). GAS is a Large Program at the Green Bank Telescope to map all Gould Belt star-forming regions with mag visible from the northern hemisphere in emission from NH 3 and other key molecular tracers. This first release includes the data for four regions in the Gould Belt clouds: B18 in Taurus, NGC 1333 in Perseus, L1688 in Ophiuchus, and Orion A North in Orion. We compare the NH 3 emission to dust continuum emission from Herschel and find that the two tracers correspond closely. We find that NH 3 is present in over 60% of the lines of sight with mag in three of the four DR1 regions, in agreement with expectations from previous observations. The sole exception is B18, where NH 3 is detected toward ∼40% of the lines of sight with mag. Moreover, we find that the NH 3 emission is generally extended beyond the typical 0.1 pc length scales of dense cores. We produce maps of the gas kinematics, temperature, and NH 3 column densities through forward modeling of the hyperfine structure of the NH 3 (1, 1) and (2, 2) lines. We show that the NH 3 velocity dispersion, , and gas kinetic temperature, T K , vary systematically between the regions included in this release, with an increase in both the mean value and the spread of and T K with increasing star formation activity. The data presented in this paper are publicly available ( https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/GAS_DR1 ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations154
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207