MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Increased Coronary Artery Dissection Rate and Severity in Murine Model of Marfan Syndrome

2016· article· en· W2609529976 on OpenAlexafffund
Nadia Milad, Stephanie Sellers, Michael A. Seidman, Pascal Bernatchez

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMarfan syndromeCardiologyMedicineInternal medicineDissection (medical)Aortic dissectionArteryAcute coronary syndromeArtery dissectionSurgeryCoronary angiographyAortaMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Marfan syndrome (MFS) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder that leads to a variety of clinical presentations ‐ most seriously, aortic root dissection and aneurysm. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection, although rare in the general population, is associated with high rate of mortality and occurs more frequently in MFS patients due to their characteristic arterial wall weakness. MFS patients are often prescribed anti‐hypertensives such as Losartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor (ATR1) antagonist, but recent clinical trials have cast doubt on their effectiveness in preventing clinical endpoints. We investigated the rate and severity of coronary artery dissection in a murine model of MFS compared to wild‐type mice. Methods Experimental mice were bred with littermate controls using the common Fbn1 C1039G/+ model of MFS giving rise to wild‐type and MFS groups. At 6 or 22 months of age, hearts were fixed, sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Movat's pentachrome and iron stains in order to visualize coronary artery dissection. Dissection was scored using a binary system (dissection or no dissection) and a severity‐weighted system (0 represents no dissection, 1 ‐ slight dissection, 2 ‐ clear dissection, 3 ‐ severe dissection). Results At 6 months of age, we saw an unexpectedly high rate of mild coronary artery dissection in wild‐type mice compared to MFS alone (100% in wild‐type vs. 50% in MFS) but when weighted for severity there was no difference between groups (1.0 for wild‐type vs. 0.88 in MFS). However at 22 months of age, the MFS group displayed a higher rate of dissection compared to wild‐type (80% vs. 33%) as well as an increase in dissection severity (1.6 vs. 0.33, respectively). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first genetic mouse model of coronary artery dissection. The unexpectedly high rate of mild dissection in wild‐type mice at 6 months of age (all were scored 1 for slight dissection) may be due to low N values at this time‐point or may be part of normal vessel maturation, unfortunately little study on coronary artery dissection in mice has been conducted. However, the observed increase in both rate and severity in MFS mice at 22 months compared to wild‐type is likely due to vessel wall fragility and elastic fibre fragmentation characteristic of MFS which left coronary arteries susceptible to further damage. Future research into the effects of Losartan treatment on rate and severity of coronary artery dissection should be done. Support or Funding Information This research was funded by CIHR grant awarded to Dr. Pascal N Bernatchez.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207