“The wounded healer” challenging the stigma attached to mental health conditions in medical students and doctors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the perception that medical students and doctors should be invincible, mental illness is over-represented in this group. Fear of exposure to stigma is a major barrier to accessing the health services and many people with mental illness continue to suffer in silence despite the availability of effective treatment. In 2014, we conceived the contact-based, anti-stigma intervention, Wounded Healer (TWH) which has been described as an innovative method of pedagogy that blends science with art. The main aims of TWH are to engage, enthuse, enthral and to educate in order to challenge mental health stigma, debunk myths and encourage help-seeking. Hitherto, TWH has been delivered to more than 10,000 people in 15 medical schools throughout the UK and worldwide in USA, Canada, Colombia, Portugal, Italy, Slovenia and Lebanon. TWH has been integrated into the curricula of several UK medical schools and filmmakers from the London College of Communication have successfully secured funding to commission the production of TWH film. The written feedback received from audiences (which has been published in peer-review journals and book chapters) is that TWH is inspirational and the best performance they have ever experienced. Moreover, TWH was delivered in the 2015 iMed 7.0 Congress in Lisbon, Portugal (the largest medical student congress in Europe, n =1000) alongside a Noble Laureate and students report that it inspired them to consider a career in psychiatry. AH is the only early-career psychiatrist to have been shortlisted for the 2015 RCPsych Communicator of the Year Award in recognition of TWH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".