An International Survey of Corticosteroid Use for the Management of Low Cardiac Output Syndrome*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Limited evidence exists on use of corticosteroids in low cardiac output syndrome following cardiac surgery. We sought to determine physicians' practices and beliefs with regard to corticosteroids therapy for low cardiac output syndrome. DESIGN: Multinational internet-based survey. SETTING: Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society member database. SUBJECTS: Pediatric cardiac intensive care physicians. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We received 188 responses from 85 centers throughout the world including 57 U.S. congenital heart centers, eight Canadian centers, and 20 international centers. The majority of respondents (51%) reported performing at least 200 bypass cases per year and had separate dedicated cardiac ICUs (57%). Most physicians (89%) rarely or never prescribe corticosteroids for mild low cardiac output syndrome (single vasoactive agent and mildly decreased perfusion), whereas 94% of those surveyed sometimes or always administer corticosteroids to patients with severe low cardiac output syndrome (two or more vasoactive agents and persistent hypotension). Hydrocortisone was the most commonly used corticosteroids (88%), but there was no consensus on dosage used. There was a variable approach to cortisol level measurement and cortisol stimulation testing to inform therapy with corticosteroids. A majority of respondents (75%) stated that they would be willing to randomize patients with severe low cardiac output syndrome into a trial of corticosteroids efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey demonstrates considerable practice variability with regard to the type of patients in whom corticosteroids are administered, adrenal axis testing is performed, and dosage of hydrocortisone used. The majority of physicians, however, stated their willingness to randomize patients with severe low cardiac output syndrome in a corticosteroids trial. This survey identified multiple areas for future research on use of corticosteroids for low cardiac output syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".