MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610048419 · doi:10.1093/sleepj/zsx050.315

0316 INSOMNIA SYMPTOMS AND EXERCISE DOSE: RISK REDUCTION IN MIDDLE-AGED WOMEN

2017· article· en· W2610048419 on OpenAlexfundno aff
C D Morse, Karen J. Klingman, Bridgett L. Jacob, Lavanya Kodali, Paula Mahon

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Lifestyle Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCronbach's alphaInsomniaMedicinePhysical therapyPopulationPsychologyClinical psychologyPsychiatryPsychometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Women during menopause transition are at increased risk for insomnia. While exercise demonstrates significance to reduce symptoms, the dose is ill-defined in the literature. The purpose of this study was to describe sleep, insomnia symptoms, and exercise in efforts to develop a natural insomnia risk reduction exercise dose preference for 40-60-year-old (middle-aged) women. A cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational design queried women about sleep, exercise, and nocturnal hot flashes. The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) identified those with insomnia symptoms. The data analyzed by binomial regression statistics to identify insomnia risk reduction using exercise report and open-ended questions to describe the phenomena. An ISI, seven-component, factor analysis investigated useful items to improve Cronbach’s Alpha for internal consistency in this population. Our study demonstrated significant differences in insomnia symptoms between reported exercise of participants (n=71) with control of hot-flashes, resulting in an identified dose for risk reduction (p<.05), and developed a brief prescreening set of questions for determining potential sleep problems (p < .001). Participants in group 1 exercise had an odds ratio 4.93 (CI 1.16–20.99, p < .05) for insomnia symptoms and the other variables, including hot flashes, had no statistical significance, p > .05. The ISI construct with seven questions resulted in a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.89) and the internal consistency improved, if reduced to 6 items (removing item #4 satisfied) as determined by a Cronbach’s Alpha 0.91. Our study results allows for a preventative exercise dose suggestion for middle-aged women and a brief insomnia pre-screening (inquiring about nocturnal hot flashes, worry about sleep, and exercise) to prompt further investigation about their sleep problem. Our study is limited by sample size; however, we feel it provides insight into an existing exercise regimen that would be helpful in preventing insomnia symptoms during women’s menopausal transition. None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicHealth and Lifestyle StudiesFrench-language works237,207