MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610200428 · doi:10.18608/hla17.027

A Critical Perspective on Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining

2017· book-chapter· en· W2610200428 on OpenAlexaff
Rita Kop, Hélène Fournier, Guillaume Durand

Bibliographic record

VenueSociety for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR) eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOnline Learning and Analytics
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Learning analyticsData scienceAnalyticsComputer scienceData analysisData miningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

of education and learning technology, which seem to ed to the educational triangle of learner, instructor, and course content (Kansanen & Meri, 1999; Meyer and the technologies being used (Bouchard, 2013). Fenwick (2015a) posits that humans and the technolsocial forces are interpenetrated in ways that have their mutual constitution in educational processes between humans and materials such as technology but also a symbiotic relationship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.017
Scholarly communication0.0110.016
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociety for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR) eBooksSame topicOnline Learning and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207