MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610300303 · doi:10.7202/1039276ar

Un pont entre deux rives : la rencontre entre la recherche et la pratique. Gervais, M.-J., & Chagnon, F. (2010). Modélisation des déterminants et des retombées de l’application des connaissances issues de la recherche psychosociale. Montréal, Canada : Chaire d’étude CJM-IU-UQÀM sur l’application des connaissances dans le domaine des jeunes et des familles en difficulté.

2015· article· fr· W2610300303 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Geneviève Riopel

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de psychoéducation · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational and Psychological Assessments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Un pont entre deux rives : la rencontre entre la recherche et la pratique / Gervais, M.-J., & Chagnon, F. (2010). Modélisation des déterminants et des retombées de l’application des connaissances issues de la recherche psychosociale. Montréal, Canada : Chaire d’étude CJM-IU-UQÀM sur l’application des connaissances dans le domaine des jeunes et des familles en difficulté.. An article from journal Revue de psychoéducation (Volume 44, Number 1, 2015, pp. 1-183), on Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.113
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.146
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1130.146
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0090.046
Scholarly communication0.0240.052
Open science0.0040.017
Research integrity0.0140.044
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.262
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de psychoéducationSame topicEducational and Psychological AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207