MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610416520 · doi:10.1039/c7nr01667k

Prediction on the light-assisted exfoliation of multilayered arsenene by the photo-isomerization of azobenzene

2017· article· en· W2610416520 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Zhao, Chunyan Liu, Wanlin Guo, Jing Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNanjing UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAzobenzeneIsomerizationExfoliation jointMaterials scienceMolecular dynamicsChemical physicsMoleculeDensity functional theoryAb initioPhotochemistryNanotechnologyComputational chemistryChemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exfoliation of gray arsenic into single- or few-layered arsenene is a challenge of utmost importance. We propose here that the conformational change in the photo-isomerization of azobenzene-based photochromes might be used to promote the exfoliation of multilayered arsenene. Our density functional theory calculations show that the trans-to-cis conformational change can lead to an increase of the adjacent interlayer distance of arsenene from 6.59 Å to 11.07 Å. Starting from the transition state, the azobenzene molecule can be isomerized into the more stable trans form based on further ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. Reactive molecular dynamics simulations also show that about a 5 Å interlayer distance change can be induced by the cis-to-trans photo-isomerization of an azobenzene-OC10H21 molecule. The computational results may inspire the experimental enthusiasm for light-driven synthesis of single or few-layered arsenene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscaleSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207