MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610442863 · doi:10.1177/0142331217701538

Energy optimization using metaheuristic bat algorithm assisted controller tuning for industrial and residential applications

2017· article· en· W2610442863 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHVACController (irrigation)MetaheuristicEnergy consumptionComputer scienceControl engineeringModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Efficient energy useEnergy (signal processing)EngineeringAir conditioningMathematical optimizationControl (management)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advent of model based control provides optimization and constrained control capabilities that can be tailored to specific goals. Metaheuristic algorithms are being researched in various fields owing to their efficiency in providing global optimization. In this paper, both model regression and energy efficiency based controller tuning are attempted using the chaotic bat algorithm (CBA). Two sets of plant data, one from an industrial precalciner temperature loop (PTL) and another from a domestic heating ventilation and air conditioning system (HVAC) are considered. Explicit model predictive control is designed. Minimizing the energy consumption (HVAC) and coal feed rate (PTL) by tuning the controllers is attempted. Results indicate that CBA can be successfully deployed in both regression and achieving control objectives as observed from the case studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it