Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article argues that a theology of miracle lies at the heart of Christian faith, for Christianity stands or falls with the resurrection of Jesus Christ, a miraculous event that breathes transcendent purpose into human existence. With the assistance of Karl Rahner, the resurrection of Jesus is shown to unlock the spiritual dimension of nature and the human person, revealing them to be creatures of God radically open to and animated by the powerful presence of the transcendent. Nature, life, and more particularly human freedom, as self-transcending finite realities and powers are manifestations of the existence and action of God and, precisely for this reason, miracles. With the help of Jürgen Moltmann, renewed access to God is then perceived to be manageable in the midst of historical absurdity, injustice, and suffering. In the miracle of the resurrection of Jesus, the conditions for authentic history and the promise of a real future are met and made. The resurrection of Jesus is the fount of unbreakable hope that, through the empowering experience of redemption, produces genuine change. Lastly, using resources from current exegetical scholarship, theology, and philosophy of religion, an attempt is made to lay foundations for a postmodern understanding of miracle by returning to the source and norm of Christian faith: Israel's experience of renewed life in, from, and for God, related in Scripture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".