MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610559685 · doi:10.2118/186064-ms

A New Permeability Anisotropy Characterization Approach for Heterogeneous Reservoir

2017· article· en· W2610559685 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPermeability (electromagnetism)GeologyAnisotropyReservoir simulationRelative permeabilityReservoir modelingBeddingPetrologyGeotechnical engineeringSoil sciencePetroleum engineeringPorosityChemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new absolute permeability upscaling method based on geological hierarchical models that affect different scales reservoir heterogeneities is presented. Reservoir anisotropy is evaluated via horizontal permeability (Kh) and vertical permeability (Kv). The new approach based on the geologic viewpoint that various geologic hierarchical-elements set result in relevant permeability display of different reservoir scales. For reservoirs, from micro-scale to macro-scale, influencing factors of permeability become abstruse. In conventional scenario, the calculation method based on single-phase numerical simulation test, core analysis and data statistics integrates all these factors as much as possible to upscale permeability. Considering reservoir anisotropy, horizontal permeability (Kh) and vertical permeability (Kv) are studied to show how anisotropy changes according to different reservoir heterogeneities. In the case study of Mackay River Oil Sand Block, Alberta, Canada, database includes regional depositional setting, core, and logging data for more than 20 wells. Generally, reservoir sedimentary setting poses a direct effect on permeability. Local rock bedding affects permeability anisotropy greatly, as well. There is no obvious linear parity between horizontal permeability (Kh) and vertical permeability (Kv) in core-plug. Vertical and lateral grain size variance also alters permeability. The mm-cm scale mud drapes have a worse effect on vertical permeability (Kv) than on horizontal permeability (Kh). Besides, bioturbations in the transitional facies could be favor of permeability. The three factors have non-linear relationship on effecting permeability. The new upscaling model synthesizes all these factors to upscale the permeability for nearly all scales of reservoirs, from the scale of core to lithofacies or even to the entire reservoir. Comparisons study is also conducted between this model and current upscaling algorithms such as arithmetic average, harmonic average, etc. The results showed that the upscaling model of this paper is more reasonable. Meanwhile, reservoir characterization hierarchical models can also be applied to explicate heterogeneity effect on the attribute of reservoir fluid qualitatively. The novelty of this approach lies in solving reservoir fluids' attributes quantitatively through exact heterogeneities analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it