MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Biologia reprodutiva do camarão sete-barbas no litoral centro sul e sul do Espírito Santo, Brasil

2013· article· pt· W2610616683 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Agnaldo Silva Martins, Hudson T. Pinheiro, Nilamon de Oliveira Leite

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletim do Instituto de Pesca · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyFishingAbundance (ecology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Reproductive cycleShrimpMaturity (psychological)FisheryGeographyReproductionEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The size at first maturity, reproductive cycle, sex ratio and recruitment of the sea-bob shrimp Xiphopenaeus kroyeri were studied from monthly samples in two coastal areas of the Espí­­rito Santo state between 2003 and 2004 in order to support sustainable management of this species. The samples were obtained with bottom trawls in small artisanal fishing boats from 4 to 8 m deep. A total of 6,006 specimens were captured, being 2,766 females, 3,182 males and 58 of undetermined sex. Females were significantly bigger than males. The average length of first maturation of females was 9.026 cm. Adult females predominated over males between December and February, coinciding with the spawning peak, while males predominated in the subsequent quarter. This alternation of proportions was associated with bathymetric migrations of reproductive females. The annual gonadal maturation cycle, seasonal abundance and sizes and recruits suggest the existence of continuous spawning and recruitment in December-February and in July and August. The difficulties of establishing a closed season in proper condition indicated that the management of the resource should receive more attention because of the issues involved, whether social, biological or environmental.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoletim do Instituto de PescaSame topicMarine and fisheries researchFrench-language works237,207