MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610616857 · doi:10.1210/jc.2017-00294

Thyroid Function Tests in the Reference Range and Fracture: Individual Participant Analysis of Prospective Cohorts

2017· review· en· W2610616857 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Carole E. Aubert, Carmen Floriani, Douglas C. Bauer, Bruno R. da Costa, Daniel Segna, Manuel R. Blum, Tinh‐Hai Collet, Howard A Fink, Anne Rentoumis Cappola, Lamprini Syrogiannouli, Robin P. Peeters, Bjørn Olav Åsvold, Wendy P. J. den Elzen, Robert Luben, Alexandra Bremner, Apostolos Gogakos, Richard Eastell, Patricia M. Kearney, Mari Hoff, Erin Le Blanc, Graziano Ceresini, Fernando Rivadeneira, André G. Uitterlinden, Kay‐Tee Khaw, Arnulf Langhammer, David J. Stott, Rudi G. J. Westendorp, Luigi Ferrucci, Graham R. Williams, Jacobijn Gussekloo, John P. Walsh, Drahomir Aujesky, Nicolas Rodondi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Nursing ResearchNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthNorwegian Institute of Public HealthNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekFP7 HealthAlexion PharmaceuticalsSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchIpsenFonterra Co-Operative GroupNational Osteoporosis SocietyCancer Research UKNational Institute on AgingNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchVeracyteEisaiNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesSanofiNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige UniversitetAlereEuropean CommissionAmgenRadius HealthAstraZenecaEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbZonMwMinistero della SalutePfizerNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMedicineEuthyroidHazard ratioProspective cohort studyContext (archaeology)Hip fractureConfidence intervalInternal medicineThyroid functionOsteoporosisThyroid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context: Hyperthyroidism is associated with increased fracture risk, but it is not clear if lower thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and higher free thyroxine (FT4) in euthyroid individuals are associated with fracture risk. Objective: To evaluate the association of TSH and FT4 with incident fractures in euthyroid individuals. Design: Individual participant data analysis. Setting: Thirteen prospective cohort studies with baseline examinations between 1981 and 2002. Participants: Adults with baseline TSH 0.45 to 4.49 mIU/L. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was incident hip fracture. Secondary outcomes were any, nonvertebral, and vertebral fractures. Results were presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) adjusted for age and sex. For clinical relevance, we studied TSH according to five categories: 0.45 to 0.99 mIU/L; 1.00 to 1.49 mIU/L; 1.50 to 2.49 mIU/L; 2.50 to 3.49 mIU/L; and 3.50 to 4.49 mIU/L (reference). FT4 was assessed as study-specific standard deviation increase, because assays varied between cohorts. Results: During 659,059 person-years, 2,565 out of 56,835 participants had hip fracture (4.5%; 12 studies with data on hip fracture). The pooled adjusted HR (95% CI) for hip fracture was 1.25 (1.05 to 1.49) for TSH 0.45 to 0.99 mIU/L, 1.19 (1.01 to 1.41) for TSH 1.00 to 1.49 mIU/L, 1.09 (0.93 to 1.28) for TSH 1.50 to 2.49 mIU/L, and 1.12 (0.94 to 1.33) for TSH 2.50 to 3.49 mIU/L (P for trend = 0.004). Hip fracture was also associated with FT4 [HR (95% CI) 1.22 (1.11 to 1.35) per one standard deviation increase in FT4]. FT4 only was associated with any and nonvertebral fractures. Results remained similar in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Among euthyroid adults, lower TSH and higher FT4 are associated with an increased risk of hip fracture. These findings may help refine the definition of optimal ranges of thyroid function tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.280
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismSame topicThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207