L'État de droit mondialisé: relations entre le droit international et domestique Book Review of The Globalized rule of Law: Relationships between International and Domestic Law)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
French Abstract: Cette recension de The Globalized Rule of Law: Relationships between International and Domestic Law loue le travail de 23 auteurs abordant l’interaction entre le droit international et le droit national. Plus specifiquement, le travail d’Oonagh E. Fitzgerald vise a examiner l’interaction entre le droit international et le droit canadien. Dans cette recension, l’auteur presente les contributions principales de l’œuvre et identifie ses forces notoires de meme que ses faiblesses. Les trois premiers chapitres analysent la maniere dont le droit international est applique dans le contexte du droit canadien ainsi que la maniere dont les tribunaux interpretent les traites actuellement en vigueur, les traites non applicables, la coutume internationale et autres sources et documents de droit international. Selon l’auteur, ces premiers chapitres sont parmi les meilleurs du volume. L’auteur soutient toutefois qu’une analyse plus approfondie des problemes lies au federalisme canadien aurait ete pertinente a la discussion. De plus, alors que les chapitres 9 et 10 discutent de l’interpretation des lois nationales a la lumiere du droit international, le chapitre 9 par Keyes et Sullivan presente un meilleur apercu de l’approche moderne et contextuelle de l’interpretation legislative, qui inclut la conformite au droit international. Bref, la pertinence de Globalized Rule of Law depasse le contexte canadien dans la mesure ou ses principes de base peuvent etre applicables a d’autres pays du Commonwealth et dans une certaine mesure, a d’autres pays de la communaute internationale. L’auteur espere que cet ouvrage collectif sensibilisera les legislateurs et le systeme judiciaire canadien en ce qui concerne les problemes souleves par l’enchevetrement des spheres juridiques internationales et nationales. English Abstract: This review of The Globalized Rule of Law: Relationships between International and Domestic Law commends the work of twenty three authors addressing the interaction between international and domestic law. More specifically, Oonagh E. Fitzgerald’s work largely seeks to examine the interplay between international and Canadian law. In this review, the author presents the main contributions of the work and identifies its main strengths and weaknesses. The first three chapters review how international law is applied in the context of Canadian law and how the courts interpret treaties currently in force, non applicable treaties, international custom and other international legal sources and documents. According to the author, these first chapters are among the best of the volume. The author submits that a more in depth analysis of issues related to Canadian federalism could have been relevant to the discussion. Further, while chapters 9 and 10 discuss the interpretation of domestic laws in light of international law, chapter 9 by Keyes and Sullivan presents a better overview of the modern and contextual approach to statutory interpretation, which includes conformity to international law. Briefly, the relevance of Globalized Rule of Law exceeds the Canadian context as its main principles can be applicable to other Commonwealth countries and to a certain extent, to other countries of the international community. It is the author’s hope that this collective work will sensitize the Canadian legislators and judiciary in terms of questions raised by the entanglement of the international and domestic judicial spheres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".