MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610681933 · doi:10.1103/physreve.95.052127

Evolution of moments and correlations in nonrenewal escape-time processes

2017· article· en· W2610681933 on OpenAlexafffund
Wilhelm Braun, Rüdiger Thul, André Longtin

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
Topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStatistical physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The theoretical description of nonrenewal stochastic systems is a challenge. Analytical results are often not available or can be obtained only under strong conditions, limiting their applicability. Also, numerical results have mostly been obtained by ad hoc Monte Carlo simulations, which are usually computationally expensive when a high degree of accuracy is needed. To gain quantitative insight into these systems under general conditions, we here introduce a numerical iterated first-passage time approach based on solving the time-dependent Fokker-Planck equation (FPE) to describe the statistics of nonrenewal stochastic systems. We illustrate the approach using spike-triggered neuronal adaptation in the leaky and perfect integrate-and-fire model, respectively. The transition to stationarity of first-passage time moments and their sequential correlations occur on a nontrivial time scale that depends on all system parameters. Surprisingly this is so for both single exponential and scale-free power-law adaptation. The method works beyond the small noise and time-scale separation approximations. It shows excellent agreement with direct Monte Carlo simulations, which allow for the computation of transient and stationary distributions. We compare different methods to compute the evolution of the moments and serial correlation coefficients (SCCs) and discuss the challenge of reliably computing the SCCs, which we find to be very sensitive to numerical inaccuracies for both the leaky and perfect integrate-and-fire models. In conclusion, our methods provide a general picture of nonrenewal dynamics in a wide range of stochastic systems exhibiting short- and long-range correlations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. ESame topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcationFrench-language works237,207