Mucin‐rich variant of traditional serrated adenoma: a distinct morphological variant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) account for 5% of serrated polyps, and have a villiform architecture, eosinophilic cells with a brush border, and indented, flat-topped luminal serrations. However, some are composed of mucin-filled goblet cells (GCs): mucin-rich TSA (MrTSA). The aim of this study was to determine whether this variant has unique features as compared with classic TSA (cTSA). METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-six TSAs were retrieved from the period 2010-2016. Patient demographics, site of polyps and 16 microscopic variables were evaluated. TSAs containing ≥50% GCs were classified as MrTSAs. Ectopic crypt foci (ECFs) were quantified as low (1-10) or high (>10), counted at ×200 magnification, and the average was taken for 10 fields. Twenty-four fulfilled the criteria for MrTSA. In males, MrTSAs (65%) were more prevalent than cTSAs (55%). There was no age difference, and both variants had a predilection for the left colon, although, in the right colon, MrTSAs were more frequent (39%) than cTSAs (10%) (P = 0.012). Adenomatous dysplasia was present in four of 24 MrTSAs (low grade, 3; high grade, 1). The most distinctive features of MrTSAs were: a variable growth pattern [endophytic (9%), mixed (30%), or villiform/exophytic (61%)], and a lower frequency of ECFs (P = 0.001) and more intraepithelial lymphocytes (P < 0.05) than in cTSAs. MrTSAs retain characteristic luminal serrations, at least focally. Inflamed MrTSAs can mimic inflammatory polyps and hamartomatous polyps (when there are >95% GCs). CONCLUSIONS: MrTSA is characterized by >50% GCs, and fewer ECFs than cTSA, but with preservation of archetypal luminal serrations. Awareness of this variant will prevent misdiagnosis, given the association of TSA with the accelerated pathway to colorectal cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".