MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610960627 · doi:10.1111/tra.12491

Oxysterol‐binding protein recruitment and activity at the endoplasmic reticulum‐Golgi interface are independent of Sac1

2017· article· en· W2610960627 on OpenAlexafffund
Mark Charman, Asako Goto, Neale D. Ridgway

Bibliographic record

VenueTraffic · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGolgi apparatusEndoplasmic reticulumCell biologyBiologyPleckstrin homology domainCOPIISecretory pathwayPhosphorylation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP) localizes to endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-Golgi contact sites where it transports cholesterol and phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI-4P), and activates lipid transport and biosynthetic activities. The PI-4P phosphatase Sac1 cycles between the ER and Golgi apparatus where it potentially regulates OSBP activity. Here we examined whether the ER-Golgi distribution of endogenous or ectopically expressed Sac1 influences OSBP activity. OSBP and Sac1 co-localized at apparent ER-Golgi contact sites in response to 25-hydroxycholesterol (25OH), cholesterol depletion and p38 MAPK inhibitors. A Sac1 mutant that is unable to exit the ER did not localize with OSBP, suggesting that sterol perturbations cause Sac1 transport to the Golgi apparatus. Ectopic expression of Sac1 in the ER or Golgi apparatus, or Sac1 silencing, did not affect OSBP localization to ER-Golgi contact sites, OSBP-dependent activation of sphingomyelin synthesis, or cholesterol esterification in the ER. p38 MAPK inhibition and retention of Sac1 in the Golgi apparatus also caused OSBP phosphorylation and OSBP-dependent activation of sphingomyelin synthesis at ER-Golgi contacts. These results demonstrate that Sac1 expression in either the ER or Golgi apparatus has a minimal impact on the PI-4P that regulates OSBP activity or recruitment to contact sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrafficSame topicCellular transport and secretionFrench-language works237,207