MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2611199637 · doi:10.1161/str.47.suppl_1.212

Abstract 212: Andexanet Alfa, a Universal Antidote for Reversal of Anticoagulation of Factor Xa Inhibitors in Healthy Human Volunteers

2016· article· en· W2611199637 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Crowther, Alexander Michael Gold, Genmin Lu, Janet M. Leeds, Brian L. Wiens, Vandana Mathur, Janice Castillo, Pamela B Conely, Stuart J. Connolly, John T. Curnutte

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversitySt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBolus (digestion)AntidotePlaceboPharmacologyAnesthesiaRivaroxabanRandomizationUrologyInternal medicineClinical trialToxicityWarfarinAtrial fibrillationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Andexanet alfa (AnXa) is a recombinant modified fXa molecule that acts as a specific antidote for fXa inhibitors. We report clinical results in healthy subjects anticoagulated with apixaban (apix), rivaroxaban (riva), edoxaban (edox), or enoxaparin (enox), demonstrating rapid and sustained reversal of anticoagulation following administration of AnXa. Methods: These were Phase 2/3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in healthy subjects. In Phase 2, about153 subjects age18 - 45 were given one of the fXa inhibitors (apix 5 mg BID, riva 20 mg QD, edox 60 mg QD or enox 40 mg QD) for 6 days. AnXa or placebo (3:1 randomization) was given IV on Day 6, 3hrs after the last inhibitor dose (∼inhibitor Cmax). Safety was followed through Day 48. A range of AnXa doses (bolus or bolus+infusion) was evaluated by correction of biomarkers (anti-fXa activity, free inhibitor concentrations and thrombin generation (TG)). In Phase 3 (ANNEXA™), older subjects age 50 to 75 were dosed with apix (5 mg BID) or riva (20 mg QD) for 4 days. ANNEXA™-A had 63 subjects treated with apix. AnXa (400 mg bolus; 400 mg bolus plus 4 mg/min x 2hr infusion) or placebo (3:1 randomization) was given on Day 4, 3 hrs after the last apix dose. ANNEXA™-R had 82 subjects treated with riva. AnXa (800 mg bolus; 800 mg bolus plus 8 mg/min x 2hr infusion) or placebo (2:1) was given on Day 4, 4 hrs after the last riva dose. Safety was followed through Day 43. Results: About 298 healthy subjects were enrolled in the studies. AnXa demonstrated rapid and sustained reversal of both direct and indirect fXa inhibitors as measured by correction of biomarkers. The ANNEXA™ studies confirmed findings from Phase 2, and met all primary (reversal of anti-fXa) and secondary endpoints (reduction of free inhibitor concentration and restoration of TG) with high statistical significance. AnXa was well-tolerated with no serious adverse events, thrombotic events, or antibodies to fX or fXa reported. Conclusion: AnXa treatment results in rapid and sustained reversal of anticoagulation of fXa inhibitors. A Phase 3b/4 confirmatory study (ANNEXA-4) in patients with acute major bleeds is ongoing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→