MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sex differences in sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness and sympatholysis

2017· article· en· W2611352449 on OpenAlexafffund
Timothy P. Just, Darren S. DeLorey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsSympathetic nervous systemMicroneurographyChemistryInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineBaroreflexBlood pressureHeart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sex differences in the neurovascular control of blood pressure and vascular resistance have been reported. However, the mechanisms underlying the modulatory influence of sex have not been fully elucidated. Nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to inhibit sympathetic vasoconstriction in resting and contracting skeletal muscle, and estrogen modulates NO synthase (NOS) expression and NO bioavailability. Therefore NO-mediated inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstriction may be enhanced in females. Thus the purpose of the present study was to investigate the hypothesis that sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness would be blunted and NO-mediated inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstriction would be enhanced in females compared with males. Male (M; n = 8) and female (F; n = 10) Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized and surgically instrumented for measurement of arterial blood pressure and femoral artery blood flow and stimulation of the lumbar sympathetic chain. The percentage change of femoral vascular conductance in response to sympathetic chain stimulation delivered at 2 and 5 Hz was determined at rest and during triceps surae muscle contraction before (control) and after NOS blockade [ Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME), 10 mg/kg iv]. At rest, sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness was augmented ( P < 0.05) in female compared with male rats at 2 Hz [F: −33 ± 8% (SD); M: −26 ± 6%] but was not different at 5 Hz (F: −55 ± 7%; M: −47 ± 7%). During muscle contraction, evoked vasoconstriction was similar ( P > 0.05) in females and males at 2 Hz (F: −12 ± 5%; M: −13 ± 5%) but was blunted ( P < 0.05) in females compared with males at 5 Hz (F: −24 ± 5%; M: −34 ± 8%). l-NAME increased ( P < 0.05) sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness in both groups at rest and during contraction. Contraction-mediated inhibition of vasoconstriction (sympatholysis) was enhanced ( P < 0.05) in females compared with males; however, sympatholysis was not different ( P > 0.05) between males and females in the presence of NOS blockade, indicating that NO-mediated sympatholysis was augmented in female rats. These data suggest that sex modulates sympathetic vascular control in resting and contracting skeletal muscle and that a portion of the enhanced sympatholysis in female rats was NO dependent. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sex differences in the neurovascular regulation of blood pressure and vascular resistance have been documented. However, our understanding of the underlying mechanisms that mediate these differences is incomplete. The present study demonstrates that female rats have an enhanced capacity to inhibit sympathetic vasoconstriction during exercise (sympatholysis) and that NO mediates a portion of the enhanced sympatholysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207