Changes in high-density lipoprotein-carried miRNA contribution to the plasmatic pool after consumption of dietary <i>trans</i> fat in healthy men
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: High-density lipoproteins (HDLs) are associated to cardioprotection and transport functional miRNAs in circulation. The aim of this study is to assess whether consumption of trans fatty acids (TFAs) modifies the HDL-carried miRNA concentration and their contribution to the plasmatic pool. Methods: In a double-blind, randomized crossover controlled study, nine healthy men were fed each of three isoenergetic 4-week diets: first, rich in industrial TFAs; second, rich in TFAs from ruminants; third, low in TFAs. miRNAs were extracted from plasma and purified HDLs, and quantified by the real-time quantitative PCR (n = 87). Results: Seven HDL-carried miRNAs contributed to more than 15% of the plasmatic pool. Although no significant difference in HDL-carried miRNA concentration among diets was observed after adjustment for multiple testing, changes in the contribution to the plasmatic pool between diets were observed for miR-124-3p, miR-375, miR-150-5p and miR-31-5p (pFDR < 0.05). These miRNAs were enriched in lipid metabolism pathways. Conclusion: These microtranscriptomic variants might reflect physiological changes in HDL functions in response to diet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it