MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2611567556

Democracia e desenvolvimento local em assentamentos rurais Democracy and local development in rural settlements Democracia y desarrollo local en los asentamientos rurales La démocratie et le développement local dans les établissements ruraux

2010· article· fr· W2611567556 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luiz Fernandes da Costa, Luís Carlos Vinhas Ítavo, Cláudia Muniz Soares, Marney Pascoli Cereda, Josemar de Campos Maciel, Celeste Brandão, Ferreira Ítavo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRural Development and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceDemocracyHumanitiesLocal DevelopmentGeographyPoliticsRegional scienceArtLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract : This article refers to the importance of democracy in the processes leading to local development in ruralsettlements. The authors were based on the conceptual core of development in accordance with institutions like theUniversity of Quebec, Canada, pointing to the settlement project Andalucia, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, as apractical example of democracy as a factor to trigger the unfolding local potential. Key-words : Democracy. Local development. Land reform. Resume : Cet article fait reference a l’importance de la democratie dans les processus conduisant au developpementlocal dans les etablissements ruraux. Les auteurs ont ete basees sur Le noyau conceptuel Du developpement emconformite avec des institutions comme l’ Universite Du Quebec, Du Canada, montrant Le projet d’installation surl’Andalousie, l’etat de Mato Grosso do Sul, comme um exemple pratique de la democratie comme um facteur dedeclencher Le deroulement des potentialites locales. Mots-cles : La democratie. Le devepoppement local. La reforme agrarie

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRural Development and AgricultureFrench-language works237,207