MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2611589213

Extracurricular activities and positive youth development: Examining how different patterns of involvement in sport and non-sport activities may impact development

2014· article· en· W2611589213 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tanya Forneris, Martin Camiré, Robert Williamson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Development and Social Support
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPositive Youth DevelopmentPsychologyContext (archaeology)Extracurricular activityDevelopmental psychologyPedagogy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to prepare students for adulthood and responsible citizenship, most high schools in Canada offer extracurricular activities to foster the development of a wide range of competencies. Past research has shown that participation in extracurricular activities, including sport, can help students develop a variety of skills and stay engaged in school which together can facilitate a successful transition to adulthood. However, additional research in this area is warranted. First, little research has examined the impact of participating in a combination of extracurricular activities. Second, no research has specifically examined the relationship between extracurricular activities and developmental assets. Third, the large majority of studies to date have been conducted in the United States where the culture of the high school context, particularly for sport, is different than in Canada. The purpose of this study was to examine whether participation in a single or a combination of extracurricular activities in high school would indicate differences on measures of developmental assets and school engagement. Results from the MANCOVA examining developmental assets indicated significant differences across numerous subscales between youth involved in both sport and non-sport extracurricular activities compared to youth not involved in extracurricular activities. Furthermore, results also indicated differences on some of the subscales between youth only involved in sport compared to youth not involved in extracurricular activities. Results from the ANOVA analysis examining student engagement also showed that youth who participated in a combination of both sport and non-sport extracurricular activities scored significantly higher compared to youth not involved in extracurricular activities. Based on these results it is recommended that parents and adult leaders encourage and support students in their involvement in various extracurricular activities, including high school sport, to facilitate positive youth development.    Acknowledgments: Ontario Federation of School Sport Associations

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and SportSame topicYouth Development and Social SupportFrench-language works237,207