MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2611707793 · doi:10.2118/186012-ms

Estimation of Three-Phase Relative Permeabilities for A WAG Process Using An Improved Ensemble Randomized Maximum Likelihood Algorithm

2017· article· en· W2611707793 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmCovarianceMonte Carlo methodNonlinear systemComputer scienceMathematical optimizationMatching (statistics)InverseReservoir simulationMathematicsStatisticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, a modified ensemble randomized maximum likelihood (EnRML) algorithm has been developed to estimate three-phase relative permeabilities with consideration of hysteresis effect by reproducing the actualproduction data. Ensemble-based history matching uses an ensemble of realizations to construct Monte Carlo approximations of the mean and covariance of the model variables, which can acquire the gradient information from the correlation provided by the ensemble. A power-law model is firstly utilized to represent the three-phase relative permeabilities whose coefficients can be automatically adjusteduntil production history is matched. A damping factor is introduced as an adjustment to the step length since a reduced step length is commonly required if an inverse problem is sufficiently nonlinear. Arecursive approach for determining the damping factor has been developed to reduce the number of iterations and the computational loadof the EnRML algorithm. The restart of reservoir simulations for reducing the cost of reservoir simulations is of significant importance for the EnRML algorithm where iterations are inevitable. By comparing a direct-restart methodand an indirect-restart method for numerical simulations, we optimize the restart method used for a specific problem. Subsequently, we validate the proposed methodologyby using a synthetic water-alternating-gas (WAG) displacement experiment and then extend it to match laboratory experiments. The proposed technique has proved toefficientlydetermine the three-phase relative permeabilities for the WAG processes with consideration of the hysteresis effect, while history matching results are gradually improved as more production data are taken into account. The synthetic scenarios demonstrate that the recursive approach saves 33.7% of the computational expense compared to the trial-and-error method when the maximum iteration is 14. Also, the consistency between the production data and model variables has been well maintained during the updating processes by using the direct-restart method, whereas the indirect-restart method fails to minimize the uncertainties associated with the model variables representing three-phase relative permeabilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.874

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it