Expression and significance of FOXM1 in human cervical cancer: A tissue micro-array study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the expression and significance of the Forkhead Box M1 (FOXM1) transcription factor in human cervical cancer. METHODS: The expression of FOXM1 protein was assessed in tissue microarrays containing 102 cervical cancer tissues by the Streptavidin-Peroxidase (SP) immunohistochemistry technique. The relationship between FOXM1 protein and clinico-pathological features (pathological stages, pathological types, TNM stage) was analyzed. RESULTS: FOXM1 protein was located in the cytoplasma and/or nucleus. The overall expression of FOXM1 in the cytoplasm and nucleus was not associated with T stages (P=0.217) or lymph node status (P=0.313). The nuclear expression of FOXM1 protein was not associated with T stage (P=0.508) or lymph node status (P=0.345). Elevated translocation and activity of FOXM1 were discovered with a secondary analysis that showed that the differences of the nuclear expression of FOXM1, among different pathological stages, were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The nuclear expression of FOXM1 in low differential cervical cancer tissues was significantly higher than in high differential cervical cancer tissues (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The overexpression of FOXM1 protein in cervical cancer maybe associated with the progression of cervical cancer, and could be a potentially novel tumor marker useful for diagnosis and therapy of cervical cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".