MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2611823064 · doi:10.1149/ma2017-01/38/1771

Ultrafast Double Optical Pump Technique for Probing Charge Transfer Processes at the Electrode-Electrolyte Interface

2017· article· en· W2611823064 on OpenAlexaff
François Lapointe, Yujin Tong, R. Kramer Campen

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteMaterials scienceUltrashort pulseElectrodeExcited stateAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Electron transferUltravioletOptoelectronicsChemistryChemical physicsLaserAtomic physicsPhotochemistryOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrode-electrolyte interface is one of the most technologically relevant there is, as it is where charge transfer occurs in driven electrochemical reactions. The short times after heterogeneous charge transfer witness the occurrence of primordial processes, such as intramolecular rearrangement and solvation shell reorganization. Yet, probing the evolution of this interface with ultrafine time resolution (10-15—10-12 s) is highly challenging, if not impossible, with electronics-based techniques. [1] Photoinjection techniques have been used to trigger charge capture by acceptors at the electrode-electrolyte interface, which was observed with > 10-9 s time resolution from photocurrent. [2] We aim to use the aqueous electron as a test bed for probing the heterogeneous charge transfer with ultrafine time resolution. The ultrafast kinetics of this fundamental species have been studied in the bulk [3], but it was never observed at the interface. We have used ultrafast laser pulses in the ultraviolet (UV) range with the intent of triggering photoinjection from a 200 nm thick polycrystalline gold electrode to the 0.5 M Na2SO4 electrolyte. The energy of the ultraviolet photons (4.64 eV) is high enough for excited electrons to reach the LUMO of water, and exposure of the electrode to the UV laser beam indeed creates a large photovoltage. A second ultrafast pulse of lower energy (ranging from 0.31 to 1.85 eV) is used to resonantly pump the excitation after a controlled delay varying from -4 ps to 100 ps with the smaller steps being of 50 fs. This second pump pulse also causes a photovoltage change, but smaller by an order of magnitude than the photovoltage caused by the first. The photovoltage due to the second pump pulse decays at a rate that is dependent on the photon energy, which yields a resonant profile that matches the absorption profile of hot electrons in water during the solvation process. [4] For instance, the decay rate at 0.31 eV is very fast, being comparable or smaller than our 50 fs minimum step size, and is independent of pump power. At 1.85 eV, however, the photovoltage lasts for longer than 100 ps, showing that a long-lasting species endures at the gold-electrolyte interface. In between, we capture the smooth evolution of the decay kinetics. We expect this technique to enable the study of ultrafast kinetics of relevant processes directly at the electrode-electrolyte interface, giving valuable mechanistic insight on important electrochemical reactions such as the oxygen reduction reactions (ORR). References [1] Amatore & Maisonhaute (2005) Anal Chem 77:303A [2] Babenko et al. (1977) J Electroanal Chem 76:347 [3] Silva et al. (1998) Phys Rev Lett 80:1086 [4] Migus et al. (1987) Phys Rev Lett 58:1559 Figure: (a) Schematics of the double pump experiment. A pulse of UV light first arrive at the electrode and photoinjects electrons into the electrolyte. After a controlled delay, a pulse of lower energy interacts resonantly with the excitation. (b) Extracted decay of the open circuit potential for a 2nd pump pulse at 1.85 eV as a function of delay. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207