Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A brick is a 3‐connected graph such that the graph obtained from it by deleting any two distinct vertices has a perfect matching. A brick is near ‐ bipartite if it has a pair of edges and such that is bipartite and matching covered; examples are and the triangular prism . The significance of near‐bipartite bricks arises from the theory of ear decompositions of matching covered graphs. The object of this paper is to establish a generation procedure which is specific to the class of simple near‐bipartite bricks. In particular, we prove that every simple near‐bipartite brick has an edge such that the graph obtained from by contracting each edge that is incident with a vertex of degree two is also a simple near‐bipartite brick, unless belongs to any of eight well‐defined infinite families. This is a refinement of the brick generation theorem of Norine and Thomas which is applicable to the class of near‐bipartite bricks. Earlier, the first author proved a similar generation theorem for (not necessarily simple) near‐bipartite bricks; we deduce our main result from this theorem. Our proof is based on a strategy of Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty and uses several of their techniques and results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".