MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612321997 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v9n3p14

Convergence Analysis for Mixed Finite Element Method of Positive Semi-definite Problems

2017· article· en· W2612321997 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yirang Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Safety Academic FundNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsFinite element methodMathematical analysisMixed finite element methodPositive-definite matrixPartial differential equationDiscretizationDarcy's lawExtended finite element methodApplied mathematicsPorous medium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mixed element-characteristic finite element method is put forward to approximate three-dimensional incompressible miscible positive semi-definite displacement problems in porous media. The mathematical model is formulated by a nonlinear partial differential system. The flow equation is approximated by a mixed element scheme, and the pressure and Darcy velocity are computed at the same time. The concentration equation is treated by the method of characteristic finite element, where the convection term is discretized along the characteristics and the diffusion term is computed by the scheme of finite element. The method of characteristics can confirm strong computation stability at the sharp fronts and avoid numerical dispersion and nonphysical oscillation. Furthermore, a large step is adopted while small time truncation error and high order accuracy are obtained. It is an important feature in numerical simulation of seepage mechanics that the mixed volume element can compute the pressure and Darcy velocity simultaneously and the accuracy of Darcy velocity is improved one order. Using the form of variation, energy method, $L^2$ projection and the technique of priori estimates of differential equations, we show convergence analysis for positive semi-definite problems. Then a powerfu tool is given to solve international famous problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207