MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612341546 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.102003

BICEP2 / <i>Keck Array</i> IX: New bounds on anisotropies of CMB polarization rotation and implications for axionlike particles and primordial magnetic fields

2017· article· en· W2612341546 on OpenAlexafffund
P. A. R. Ade, Zeeshan Ahmed, R. W. Aikin, K. D. Alexander, D. Barkats, Steven J. Benton, C. A. Bischoff, J. J. Bock, Rachel Bowens-Rubin, J. A. Brevik, I. Buder, E. Bullock, V. Buza, Jake Connors, B. P. Crill, L. Duband, Cora Dvorkin, J. P. Filippini, S. Fliescher, T. St. Germaine, T. Ghosh, J. Grayson, S. Harrison, S. R. Hildebrandt, G. C. Hilton, H. Hui, K. D. Irwin, J. Kang, K. S. Karkare, E. Karpel, J. P. Kaufman, Brian Keating, S. Kefeli, S. A. Kernasovskiy, J. M. Kovac, C. L. Kuo, N. Larson, E. M. Leitch, K. G. Megerian, Lorenzo Moncelsi, Toshiya Namikawa, C. B. Netterfield, H. T. Nguyen, R. O’Brient, R. W. Ogburn, C. Pryke, S. Richter, A. Schillaci, R. Schwarz, C. D. Sheehy, Z. Staniszewski, B. Steinbach, R. V. Sudiwala, G. P. Teply, K. Thompson, J. E. Tolan, C. Tucker, Anthony Turner, A. G. Vieregg, A. C. Weber, Don Wiebe, J. Willmert, C. L. Wong, W. L. K. Wu, K. W. Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchUniversity of Toronto
FundersSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryScience and Technology Facilities CouncilJet Propulsion LaboratoryHarvard UniversityCanada Foundation for InnovationForeign Agricultural ServiceOffice of ScienceNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsCosmic microwave backgroundPolarization (electrochemistry)AmplitudeAnisotropySpectral densityFaraday effectAstrophysicsMagnetic fieldOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the strongest constraints to date on anisotropies of cosmic microwave background (CMB) polarization rotation derived from 150 GHz data taken by the BICEP2 Keck Array CMB experiments up to and including the 2014 observing season (BK14). The definition of the polarization angle in BK14 maps has gone through self-calibration in which the overall angle is adjusted to minimize the observed $TB$ and $EB$ power spectra. After this procedure, the $QU$ maps lose sensitivity to a uniform polarization rotation but are still sensitive to anisotropies of polarization rotation. This analysis places constraints on the anisotropies of polarization rotation, which could be generated by CMB photons interacting with axionlike pseudoscalar fields or Faraday rotation induced by primordial magnetic fields. The sensitivity of BK14 maps ($\ensuremath{\sim}3\text{ }\text{ }\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{K}\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{arc}\text{ }\mathrm{min}$) makes it possible to reconstruct anisotropies of the polarization rotation angle and measure their angular power spectrum much more precisely than previous attempts. Our data are found to be consistent with no polarization rotation anisotropies, improving the upper bound on the amplitude of the rotation angle spectrum by roughly an order of magnitude compared to the previous best constraints. Our results lead to an order of magnitude better constraint on the coupling constant of the Chern-Simons electromagnetic term ${g}_{a\ensuremath{\gamma}}\ensuremath{\le}7.2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}2}/{H}_{I}$ (95% confidence) than the constraint derived from the $B$-mode spectrum, where ${H}_{I}$ is the inflationary Hubble scale. This constraint leads to a limit on the decay constant of ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}6}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{f}_{a}/{M}_{\mathrm{pl}}$ at mass range of ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}33}\ensuremath{\le}{m}_{a}\ensuremath{\le}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}28}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ for $r=0.01$, assuming ${g}_{a\ensuremath{\gamma}}\ensuremath{\sim}\ensuremath{\alpha}/(2\ensuremath{\pi}{f}_{a})$ with $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ denoting the fine structure constant. The upper bound on the amplitude of the primordial magnetic fields is 30 nG (95% confidence) from the polarization rotation anisotropies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207