Folksonomie d’entreprise : nouvelles pratiques sociales et informationnelles dans un contexte international
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cette communication est de comprendre les dynamiques d’appropriation et d’intégration de technologies web 2.0 dans une entreprise internationale. Il s’agit de détailler l’utilisation d’une folksonomie comme outil d’indexation sociale en milieu professionnel, en fournissant des éléments théoriques et empiriques sur les usages en recherche et partage d’informations dans une entreprise mondialisée. Nous tâcherons de comprendre comment les interactions sociales contribuent à la création, la gestion et l'adoption d’une folksonomie en entreprise et comment la folksonomie enrichie participe au décloisonnement du savoir, en particulier chez un éditeur de jeux vidéo (Ubisoft).This paper aims to understand the dynamics of appropriation and integration of Web 2.0 technologies in a multinational company. We describe in detail the use of a folksonomy as a tool for social indexing in the workplace, providing theoretical and empirical evidence on the use in research and information sharing in a globalized company. We endeavour to understand how social interactions can contribute to the creation, management and adoption of a company folksonomy and how the enriched folksonomy contributes to breaking down the barriers of knowledge, especially at a video game publisher (Ubisoft).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.039 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".