Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first Stream Session will be on Wednesday, March 29 from 2:00-4:00 pm at the conference room at the Burnaby Campus (8652). Stream Sessions are intended to be a colloquium where graduate students are invited to present their ideas to fellow students and faculty of the School of Communication. Topics for presentation can range from working papers to discussions of comprehensive or thesis readings to new theories and ideas still in the process of being formed. It’s an opportunity to workshop ideas among peers in a productive yet low-stakes environment while also receiving valuable feedback from students and faculty.
 For more details, please see the attached PDF. 
 The following students will be presenting work for the first Stream Sessions. Each presentation will run 10-15 minutes with 15 minutes for discussion afterward.
 Stream Sessions - Wednesday March 29 2:00-4:00 pm SFU Burnaby Room 8652
 2:00-2:30 - Alberto Lusoli (PhD Student) - “From Social to Critical Constructivism. An Exploration of the Main Schools of Thought in the Field of Science, Technology and Society"
 2:30-3:00 - Geneva Lam (Master’s Student) - “Explaining Ethnic Media through the Lens of Language, Identity and Culture “
 3:00-3:30 - Shawna-Kay Thomas (Double-Degree Master’s Student) - “‘Portia Loves the Poor’ - Portia Simpson Miller and Affective Politics in Jamaicaâ€
 3:30-4:00 - Peter Zuurbier and Darren Fleet (PhD Students) “It Just Feels Right: Affective Veridiction in the Contemporary West.â€
 Faculty Referee: Frédérik Lesage
 There will be light refreshments served. Following the event, we encourage everyone attending and participating to make their way to the Highland Pub for drinks and continued conversation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it