Modeling of biomass steam gasification in a dual fluidized bed reactor with/without lime-based CO₂ capture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lime-enhanced biomass gasification in a dual fluidized bed (DFB) reactor is a promising technology that allows enhanced hydrogen production from a renewable resource with simultaneous CO₂ capture via calcium looping. In this thesis, modeling Ca-looping in a DFB biomass gasifier is broken down into different steps. Firstly, a comprehensive single particle model is developed, based on conservation of mass, energy and momentum, with two different biomass pyrolysis kinetic schemes for particles of changing thermo-physical properties. Secondly, a coupled particle and reactor model of biomass drying and pyrolysis in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor is developed to predict the yields of pyrolysis products and composition as a function of process operating parameters. Thirdly, our coupled particle and reactor model is extended to steam gasification of biomass in a bubbling fluidized bed (BFB) gasifier, and its applicability is tested by comparing predictions with independent experimental data from the literature. For steam gasification of pine sawdust at a reactor temperature of 750°C, the H₂ mole fraction in the product gas increases with increasing steam-to-biomass ratio because of the water-gas, steam methane reforming and water-gas shift (WGS) reactions. Elevating the reactor temperature reverses the exothermic WGS reaction towards more CO production and CO₂ consumption. Fourthly, the BFB gasifier model is expanded into a generic two-phase fluidized bed reactor model to evaluate the performance of the UBC dual fluidized bed gasifier under steady-state operating conditions. Finally, integrated biomass gasification with cyclic CO₂ capture in a DFB reactor is simulated by developing a model which takes into account sorbent loss of reactivity due to sintering during cyclic operation. This comprehensive reactor model is developed and tested based on a stepwise approach. Unlike previous models, this is a predictive model that minimizes reliance on empirical correlations. By coupling single particle and reactor models, biomass drying, pyrolysis and gasification are studied as a continuous process. A gap of knowledge in predicting major compounds composition in pyrolysis gas is addressed. Furthermore, the kinetic model is capable of accommodating in situ CO₂ capture during cyclic operation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".