MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612672760 · doi:10.9771/ccrh.v15i37.18602

TRABALHO, EXCLUSÃO E PRECARIZAÇÃO SOCIOECONÔMICA: o debate das ciências sociais na França

2006· article· pt· W2612672760 on OpenAlexaff
Helena Hirata, Edmond Préteceille

Bibliographic record

VenueCaderno CRH · 2006
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Solidarity
Canadian institutionsThe Quebec Population Health Research Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSocioeconomic statusPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophyDemographyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nos últimos quinze anos, a precarização socioeconômica é um dos temas centrais no debate das ciências sociais na França. A primeira parte deste trabalho enfoca o debate sobre a reestruturação econômica e sua incidência sobre o mundo operário. A segunda propõe modelos interpretativos das causa da precarização socioeconômica a partir de uma reflexão sobre as transformações do trabalho. Tais transformações afetam alguns grupos particularmente vulneráveis: mulheres, jovens, imigrantes. A terceira parte é consagrada ao tratamento de tais grupos. Enfim, a questão da exclusão e dos efeitos da precarização sobre as práticas sociais fora do trabalho, assim como as repercussões das transformações da vida cotidiana sobre a relação do trabalhador com sua atividade profissional, serão tratadas na quarta parte. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Precarização, flexibilidade, intensificação do trabalho, modos de vida, mobilização coletiva, o futuro do trabalho.LABOR, EXCLUSION AND SOCIOECONOMIC PRECARIZATION: social sciences debate in France Helena Hirata Edmond Préteceille For the last fifteen years, the social scinces debate in France has centered in socioeconomic precarization. The first part of the paper focus on the debate about the economic restructuring and its incidence on the world of labor; the second one proposes interpretative models for the socioeconomic precarization causes based on thoughts on labor transformations. The referred transformations affect some especially vulnerable groups: women, youths, and immigrants. The third part is dedicated to the form of dealing with these groups. Finally, the issue of exclusion and the effects of precarization on the social practices that are not inserted in the labor environment, as well as the repercussions of the daily life transformation on the relationship of the workers with their professional will be approached in the fourth part. KEY WORDS: Precarization, flexibility, labor intensification, ways of life, collective mobilization, the future of labor. Publicação Online do Caderno CRH: http://www.cadernocrh.ufba.br

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.018
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCaderno CRHSame topicSocial and Economic SolidarityFrench-language works237,207