TRABALHO, EXCLUSÃO E PRECARIZAÇÃO SOCIOECONÔMICA: o debate das ciências sociais na França
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nos últimos quinze anos, a precarização socioeconômica é um dos temas centrais no debate das ciências sociais na França. A primeira parte deste trabalho enfoca o debate sobre a reestruturação econômica e sua incidência sobre o mundo operário. A segunda propõe modelos interpretativos das causa da precarização socioeconômica a partir de uma reflexão sobre as transformações do trabalho. Tais transformações afetam alguns grupos particularmente vulneráveis: mulheres, jovens, imigrantes. A terceira parte é consagrada ao tratamento de tais grupos. Enfim, a questão da exclusão e dos efeitos da precarização sobre as práticas sociais fora do trabalho, assim como as repercussões das transformações da vida cotidiana sobre a relação do trabalhador com sua atividade profissional, serão tratadas na quarta parte. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Precarização, flexibilidade, intensificação do trabalho, modos de vida, mobilização coletiva, o futuro do trabalho.LABOR, EXCLUSION AND SOCIOECONOMIC PRECARIZATION: social sciences debate in France Helena Hirata Edmond Préteceille For the last fifteen years, the social scinces debate in France has centered in socioeconomic precarization. The first part of the paper focus on the debate about the economic restructuring and its incidence on the world of labor; the second one proposes interpretative models for the socioeconomic precarization causes based on thoughts on labor transformations. The referred transformations affect some especially vulnerable groups: women, youths, and immigrants. The third part is dedicated to the form of dealing with these groups. Finally, the issue of exclusion and the effects of precarization on the social practices that are not inserted in the labor environment, as well as the repercussions of the daily life transformation on the relationship of the workers with their professional will be approached in the fourth part. KEY WORDS: Precarization, flexibility, labor intensification, ways of life, collective mobilization, the future of labor. Publicação Online do Caderno CRH: http://www.cadernocrh.ufba.br
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it