Bibliographic record
Abstract
All citizens of the Republic of Lithuania over 16 years of age have the right to insure with voluntary social insurance. There are two types of insurance – voluntary pension insurance and voluntary social insurance for sickness and motherhood allowances. In the case of pension insurance, contributions are paid quarterly, and those contributions are 50 percent of the basic pension, while sickness and maternity contributions are paid at least once per quarter and the sum of the contribution can vary from 10 to 200 Litas per month. Social guarantees for artists constitute a specific sphere of regulation. The main problem is that artists in accordance with their work specifics do not have a stable income, and their nature of work is not defined as regards work time, work place, work tools, and an employment contract itself. For instance, a sculptor can work at home (workshop) at the time suitable for his creative inspiration (day or night), using his own work instruments, and the work may take a few years. Payment for a concluded work can be done in advance (provided that there is a contract-giver) and after the conclusion of works. This and other reasons complicate the relations of artists and Sodra, the State Social Insurance Fund Board of the Republic of Lithuania (e. g., issues on how many months per year an artist is working, what is his length of service, income, the problem of contribution periodicity, etc.). Therefore, it is hard to solve the administrative difficulties that are connected with applying Sodra’s tax to artists. Even if these problems are solved, there still arises a problem of great importance taking into account the future problems of Sodra, i. e. the problem of the reality of earned pensions to all insurants, especially to the artists, whose legal status in case of pension receiving is not strictly defined. The article analyzes the experience of other European Union member states in the field of artists’ social guarantees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".