Phenolic Profile of Peanut By‐products: Antioxidant Potential and Inhibition of Alpha‐Glucosidase and Lipase Activities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Free, esterified, etherified and insoluble‐bound phenolics from three samples, namely meal from whole peanuts (MWP), meal from dry‐blanched peanuts (MDBP) and peanut skin (PS) were evaluated for their total phenolic content (TPC), and phenolic profile using HPLC–DAD–ESI–MS n . The TPC was in the order of PS > MWP > MDBP. Among 37 compounds identified 10 were reported for peanuts for the first time. Proanthocyanidins were detected in peanut skin and MWP, but not in MDBP. The presence of peanut skin in MWP rendered up to 9.8‐fold higher scavenging activity towards the DPPH radical as compared with MDBP. Phenolics from all samples and fractions showed inhibition of alpha‐glucosidase and lipase activities, which are key enzymes involved in the absorption of glucose and triacylglycerols, respectively. Therefore, their antioxidant properties as well as their potential role in the management of diabetes and obesity makes them worthy of further consideration as functional food ingredients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".