Theory of a Time Domain Boundary Element Development for the Dynamic Analysis of Coupled Multiphase Porous Media
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an advanced formulation of the time-domain two-dimensional (2D) boundary element method (BEM) for an elastic, homogeneous unsaturated soil subjected to dynamic loadings. Unlike the usual time-domain BEM, the present formulation applies a convolution quadrature which requires only the Laplace-domain instead of the time-domain fundamental solutions. The coupled equations governing the dynamic behavior of unsaturated soils ignoring contributions of the inertia effects of the fluids (water and air) are derived based on the poromechanics theory within the framework of a suction-based mathematical model. In this formulation, the solid skeleton displacements [Formula: see text], water pressure [Formula: see text] and air pressure [Formula: see text] are presumed to be independent variables. The fundamental solutions in Laplace transformed-domain for such a dynamic [Formula: see text] theory have been obtained previously by authors. Then, the BE formulation in time is derived after regularization by partial integrations and time and spatial discretizations. Thereafter, the BE formulation is implemented in a 2D boundary element code (PORO-BEM) for the numerical solution. To verify the accuracy of this implementation, the displacement response obtained by the boundary element formulation is verified by comparison with the elastodynamics problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it