Optimal power flow for converter-dominated AC/DC hybrid microgrids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a new optimal power flow (OPF) formulation based on loadability maximization for islanded converter-dominated AC/DC hybrid microgrids. Hybridizing AC and DC at the distribution level brings the merits of AC and DC together as a valuable future layout for AC and DC technologies. Nevertheless, most recent AC/DC distributed resources and loads are converter-based resulting in low inertia. Further, the future distribution systems will allow investors and customers to plug their energy resources in and out. Such systems with a high penetration of converters and plug-and-play capability will have their own operational philosophy. During islanding in particular, loadability maximization is more pronounced due to the limited resources and being susceptible to any sudden and slow load/supply variations. Thus, the target of the system operator might be to increase the system steady-state stability margin by running OPF. In this work, the AC/DC OPF problem is formulated as a nonlinear constrained optimization problem, and solved by Interior Point method. The newly formulated OPF algorithm is tested on a modified 38-bus AC/DC hybrid microgrid. The developed AC/DC OPF can be a powerful tool for system planners and operators to explore the technical and economic challenges related to hybridizing the AC distribution systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".