MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612839617 · doi:10.1039/c7an00216e

A field-deployed surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor for RDX quantification in environmental waters

2017· article· en· W2612839617 on OpenAlexafffund
Thibault Brulé, Geneviève Granger, Natalia Bukar, Clarisse Deschênes-Rancourt, Thierry Havard, Andreea R. Schmitzer, Richard Martel, Jean‐François Masson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsSurface plasmon resonanceMaterials scienceField (mathematics)Resonance (particle physics)Surface plasmonEnvironmental sciencePlasmonOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyEnvironmental chemistryChemistryNanoparticlePhysicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A field-deployable surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor is reported for the detection of the energetic material (commonly termed explosives) 1,3,5-trinitroperhydro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) at ppb concentration in environmental samples. The SPR sensor was first validated under laboratory conditions with uncontaminated natural water samples spiked with known concentrations of RDX near the EPA limit of 2 ppb, which was then applied to monitor environmental samples collected in different downgradient wells near a grenade training range. The SPR sensor was finally tested on the field, where environmental samples were analysed on location in less than 90 minutes per well, which included the time to setup the equipment, sample the well and analyse the sample. The SPR analysis time was less than 45 minutes for equilibration, recalibration and measuring the water sample. Results obtained with the SPR sensors were cross-validated with the standard HPLC method (EPA method 8330b), and they showed good agreement with an accuracy within less than 1.6 ppb for analysis at the sampling sites, and with the relative standard deviation (RSD) better than 20% for field and laboratory measurements. The SPR sensor worked in a range of environmental conditions, including operation from about 0 °C to nearly 30 °C. The instrument was easily deployed near the sampling site using motor vehicles under summer conditions (Lab-in-a-Jeep) and using a sled under winter conditions (Lab-on-a-sled), showcasing the field deployability of the RDX SPR sensor and the possibility of continuously monitoring RDX in the environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AnalystSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207