MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Geomorphic Impacts of Highway Construction, Their Causes and Remedies: A Case Study from Aqaba, Southern Jordan

2011· article· en· W2613161685 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yahya Farhan

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWadiFluvialEphemeral keyFlood mythAlluvial fanLandformAlluviumGeologyHydrology (agriculture)AridGeographyArchaeologyGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Aqaba by-pass was constructed through extremely rugged and arid granite mountains and alluvial piedmont overlooking the lower Wadi Araba and the Gulf of Aqaba. Different landform units, surface materials, and abundant ephemeral wadi channels exist along the road corridor. On 21 March 1991, after the completion of road construction and before its opening to trafic, a flood of 6-7 years return period occurred and caused heavy damage to the road. Another flood in December 1993 exposed the road to additional damage and problems. A geomorphological survey was carried out to evaluate the road corridor with respect to fluvial processes affecting the road and its safety. Three engineering geomorphological problems were recognized: (i) inadequate design for almost all major and minor wadi crossings; (ii) lack of understanding of geomorphic setting along the road corridor—fluvial activity, braided and changing wadi channels, sediment sources, and potential flood hazard had not been fully appreciated in the desi...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207