MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613325009

Gail Bourgeois : Correspondence : From Roots to Rhizomes to Mycelial Networks = Correspondance : De racines en rhizomes en réseaux mycéliens

2016· book· fr· W2613325009 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rebecca Basciano

Bibliographic record

VenueGalerie d'art d'Ottawa / The Ottawa Art Gallery eBooks · 2016
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBourgeoisieArtArt historyDozenPICASSOModernism (music)HumanitiesPoliticsLawPainting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Publication documenting conceptual works that reflect artist Gail Bourgeois' engagement with the Firestone Collection of Canadian Art - one of the country's most important collections of works by modernist artists such as Arthur Lismer, A.Y. Jackson, Edmund Alleyn and Anne Savage. Bourgeois' renderings in ink wash, wax crayon, graphite and watercolour are simultaneously organic and architectural, delicate and bold, and reveal her sophisticated understanding of composition. The artist draws inspiration from roots, rhizomes and mycelial networks found in nature, intermingled with themes such as connectivity, multiplicity and cartography found in A Thousand Plateaus (1980), the collaborative philosophical text authored by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, to produce works that cause a rupture in overarching narratives and serve as a departure point for new ways of thinking. Gail Bourgeois is a founding member of the feminist art space Powerhouse Gallery (La Centrale, Montreal), and has founded or formed part of a dozen artists' collectives. In English and French. -- Distributor's website.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGalerie d'art d'Ottawa / The Ottawa Art Gallery eBooksSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207