Free Flap Donor Site Preference: A Surrogate Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine which free tissue flap donor sites are preferred, in order to optimize patient satisfaction following reconstructive head and neck surgery. The design was a prospective survey at the University of Toronto Medical School. Two hundred sixty-six junior medical students participated (121 males, 145 females, mean age range 18–35 years), with the following cultural representation: Asian (21.3%), English (18.3%), European (17.5%), Indian (13.7%), Jewish (11.0%), mixed (8.7%), Arab (4.6%), African (4.6%), French (1.1%), West Indian (1.1%), Latin American (0.4%). The students completed a Free-Flap Preference Survey after being shown pre- and postoperative images of 4 reconstructive flaps: anterolateral thigh, scapular, radial forearm, and pectoralis myocutaneous. The main outcome measures were mean preference rating scores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it