MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613986397

Negative symptom correlates of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in schizophrenia

2014· article· en· W2613986397 on OpenAlexaffabout
Markus J. Duncan, Kelly P. Arbour‐Nicitopoulos, Gary Remington, Guy Faulkner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBehavioral Health and Interventions
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychologySchizoaffective disorderApathyPopulationAmotivationClinical psychologyPsychiatryMedicinePsychosisCognitionIntrinsic motivation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: People with schizophrenia tend to engage in less physical activity (PA) than the general population, and experience higher rates of cardiovascular disease and obesity. Symptoms of schizophrenia are heterogeneous, and categorized as Positive, Negative, or Cognitive. Negative symptoms (NS) – deficits in typical function – have been consistently associated with less PA among people with schizophrenia. Certain NS, specifically amotivation, may be more relevant to engaging in goal-directed activities than others. Associations between specific NS and PA have not been reported. A secondary analysis of reliability data for a Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) inventory for PA in schizophrenia examined relationships between symptomology, PA and sedentary behaviour. Methods: 26 participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were assessed for symptoms using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Clinical Global Impression Severity scale (CGI), and the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES). Participants reported moderate and vigorous PA and sitting time from the previous 7 days using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and PA Intentions from the HAPA inventory. Results: Pearson correlations revealed significant associations between high levels of amotivation (AES) and fewer weekly minutes of moderate PA ( r =-.41, p =.035) and PA intentions ( r =-.56, p =.003). Total BPRS ( r =-.56, p =.003), the NS factor of the BPRS ( r =.40, p =.045) and CGI scores ( r =-.54, p =.004) were also inversely related to PA intentions. Sitting time was related to total BPRS ( r =.43, p =.042) and CGI scores ( r =.45, p =.032); a similar trend emerged with the AES (r=.38, p=.08). Symptom scales did not significantly correlate with vigorous or moderate-to-vigorous PA. Conclusion: These findings suggest a central role for amotivation as a disease-related barrier to moderate PA in patients with schizophrenia. A larger sample size would allow for more specific analysis of symptomology correlates of PA, which may help tailor PA promotion to the heterogeneous needs of this population. Acknowledgments: This study was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) operating grant #MOP-115709.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and SportSame topicBehavioral Health and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207