Connecting dark matter particles with the primary, obscure and normal particles through implicit causality
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary, obscure and normal particles with respective limiting velocities c1, c2 and c3,solutions from bicubic equation, offer comfortable venues to tackle the newly emergent dark matter particles. Particular emphasis is given to particles with velocities of O(10-3c) ( with c the velocity of light) and whose energies are from 1eV to over 100GeV for which the congruent parameter z = 3p3mv2/2E assumes values of 10-6 and 10-7. At z = 10-6 with mc2 = 100GeV one can have E = 260GeV or with E = 1eV one can have mc2 = 0:38eV; while at z = 10-7 with mc2 = 100GeV one can have E = 2:6TeV or with E = 1eV one can have mc2 = 0:038eV. The small values of the congruent parameter z allow the limiting velocities c1, c2 and c3 as well as the resulting energy expressions be written down perturbatevly in terms of the congruent parameter z.It is shown that for mc2 = 100GeV particle in the MilkyWay Dark Matter Velocity Profile (Laha, 2016), the derived limiting velocities of primary, obscure and normal particles as dark matter particles are: c1 = 1; 7c (z = 10-7), 1:34c; 2:15c (z = 10-6); c2 = +-i1; 7c (z = 10-7), +-i1:34c; +-i2:15c (z = 10-6), and c3 = v (z = 10-7; 10-6). Perturbatively, for a very small common primary and obscure particle velocity v compared to the absolute values of their limiting velocities, one shows that the obscure particle acquires (-mv2) intrinsic negative energy with respect to the primary particle,with m being their common mass.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it