Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Rhin est de loin le premier fleuve navigable d’Europe, autant par son accessibilité nautique que par les 300 Mt de fret qui y transitent. A lui seul, il représente aujourd’hui plus de 60% des tonnages acheminés par voie d’eau en Europe. L’axe qu’il constitue dessert de grands centres urbains et industriels qu’il met en relation entre eux et, de plus en plus, avec le reste du monde via sa très puissante façade maritime. L’artificialisation de son cours a été portés par les Etats riverains pour favoriser sa navigabilité. De fait, le contrôle du trafic rhénan a été de longue date l’enjeu de conflits européens pour des raisons autant militaires que commerciales. Mais simultanément, il a aussi été l’objet de coopérations anciennes entre Etats, qui n’ont cessé de s’approfondir. Les divers aménagements du fleuve comme axe de transport, portent aujourd’hui encore les marques de cette fonction de charnière politique. Elle n’a cessé d’inscrire le Rhin dans une dialectique d’appropriation et de partage qui l’éloigne d’une lecture trop simplement linéaire de l’effacement contemporain des frontières internes de l’Europe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".