MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614155936

Die Rheinschifffahrt- eine andere Geschichte des Aufbaus Europas

2012· preprint· de· W2614155936 on OpenAlexaff
Antoine Beyer

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2012
Typepreprint
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCross-Border Cooperation and Integration
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Transports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Rhin est de loin le premier fleuve navigable d’Europe, autant par son accessibilité nautique que par les 300 Mt de fret qui y transitent. A lui seul, il représente aujourd’hui plus de 60% des tonnages acheminés par voie d’eau en Europe. L’axe qu’il constitue dessert de grands centres urbains et industriels qu’il met en relation entre eux et, de plus en plus, avec le reste du monde via sa très puissante façade maritime. L’artificialisation de son cours a été portés par les Etats riverains pour favoriser sa navigabilité. De fait, le contrôle du trafic rhénan a été de longue date l’enjeu de conflits européens pour des raisons autant militaires que commerciales. Mais simultanément, il a aussi été l’objet de coopérations anciennes entre Etats, qui n’ont cessé de s’approfondir. Les divers aménagements du fleuve comme axe de transport, portent aujourd’hui encore les marques de cette fonction de charnière politique. Elle n’a cessé d’inscrire le Rhin dans une dialectique d’appropriation et de partage qui l’éloigne d’une lecture trop simplement linéaire de l’effacement contemporain des frontières internes de l’Europe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicCross-Border Cooperation and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207