MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614228339 · doi:10.1002/ejic.201700485

Front Cover: C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H Bond Activation Induced by Monohydroborane Coordination at an Iridium(III)–Phosphoramidate Complex (Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 20/2017)

2017· paratext· en· W2614228339 on OpenAlexaff
Marcus W. Drover, Cheyenne J. Christopherson, Laurel L. Schafer, Jennifer A. Love

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Inorganic Chemistry · 2017
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphoramidateChemistryIridiumFront coverSurface modificationLigand (biochemistry)Cover (algebra)StereochemistryCombinatorial chemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cover picture shows C(sp3)–H functionalization of an iridium(III)–phosphoramidate complex using a monohydroborane, dicyclohexylborane. The grain field in the background grows as a function of phosphoramidate ligand functionalization. This notion is supported by our article, which describes the synthesis of functionalized organophosphates using controlled C(sp3)–H bond activation. We hope that this will lead to new routes for the synthesis of phosphorus-containing pesticides and agrochemicals. Details are discussed in the Communication by L. L. Schafer, J. A. Love et al. on page 2639 ff (DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201601518). For more on the story behind the cover research, see the Cover Profile (DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201700486/full).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score0.907

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3640.078

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Inorganic ChemistrySame topicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207