MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Catalytic Mechanism of Glutamyl-tRNA Synthetase of Escherichia coli

2005· article· en· W2614366042 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Kern, Jacques Lapointe

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Biochemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAminoacylationTernary complexEnzymeChemistryProduct inhibitionEscherichia coliTransfer RNAAllosteric regulationBiochemistryEnzyme kineticsStereochemistrySubstrate (aquarium)NucleotideBiologyActive siteRNANon-competitive inhibition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sequence of substrate binding and of end-product dissociation at the steady state of the catalytic process of tRNAGlu aminoacylation by glutamyl-tRNA synthetase from Escherichia coli has been investigated using bisubstrate kinetics, dead-end and end-product inhibition studies. The nature of the kinetic patterns indicates that ATP and tRNAGlu bind randomly to the free enzyme, whereas glutamate binds only to the ternary enzyme . tRNAGlu . ATP complex. Binding of ATP to the enzyme hinders that of tRNAGlu and vice versa. After interconversion of the quaternary enzyme . substrates complex the end-products dissociate in the following order: PPi first, AMP second and Glu-tRNA last. In addition to its role as substrate and as effector with ATP for the binding of glutamate, tRNAGlu promotes the catalytically active enzyme state. Whereas at saturating tRNAGlu concentration the catalysis is rate-determining, this conformational change can be rate-determining at low tRNAGlu concentrations. The results are discussed in the light of the two-step aminoacylation pathway catalyzed by this synthetase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of BiochemistrySame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207