MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614490250

Aporije prosvijećenog diskursa : (anti)morlakizam u djelima Alberta Fortisa i Ivana Lovrića

2017· dissertation· hr· W2614490250 on OpenAlex
Anja Grgurinović

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepozitorij Filozofskog fakulteta u Zagrebu' at University of Zagreb (University of Zagreb) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languagehr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBalkan and Eastern European Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyBarbarismContext (archaeology)Topos theoryHistoryPoliticsEnlightenmentLiteratureHumanitiesEpistemologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceArtLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the paper is to offer new perspectives in the analysis of Morlacchism as a discourse within the theoretical and methodological framework of historical imagology, through the examples of two prominent texts of the Enlightenment: Alberto Fortis' Travels into Dalmatia and Ivan Lovric's Observations on Travels into Dalmatia by the Abbe Alberto Fortis and The Life of Stanislav Socivica. Although historical imagology opened up new perspectives reagarding the research of Vlachs/Morlacchi within historiography, mainstream views largely excluded an economic perspective of Morlacchism, focusing mainly on such concepts as „civilization“ and „barbarism“, without critical reflection as to what constitutes these concepts. The main focus of this paper is, therefore, the analysis of Morlacchism through the analytical apparatus of historical imagology (the analysis of text, intertextual relations and context), but with special regard to physiocracy as an economic doctrine, the influence of which can be seen in the texts of Fortis and Lovric. The Morlacchi as an economic Other are analyzed in the two texts through the topoi of economic irrationality, backwardness and autarchy, with supplemental topoi of gender roles and the representations of the peasant inhabitants of the Dalmatian coast. This complex imageme of the Morlacchi as an economic Other is later placed within intertextual relations: between the texts of Fortis and Lovric, the famous text Tableau Economique by Francois Quesnay which represents the main theoretical tenets of physiocracy, and the texts of prominent Dalmatian physiocrats. The final stage of analysis shows the way in which Morlacchims fits into the political and economic context of 18th century Venetian Republic and Dalmatia, focusing on structural changes and particular economic measures conducted by the Venetian and Dalmatian patriciate, as well as on the similarities and differences between the biographies and lives of Fortis and Lovric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it