Bibliographic record
Abstract
A partir de uma análise das obras Temor e tremor, A Repetição e do discurso edificante Fortalecendo o homem interior, do filósofo e teólogo dinamarquês Søren Kierkegaard, o presente trabalho visa apresentar como a fé, juntamente com a categoria da ‘repetição,' conceito também central no pensamento do filósofo, aparece como elemento fundamental para que o ser humano torne-se si mesmo e, portanto, um indivíduo singular. Referências BibliográficasBÍBLIA DE JERUSALÉM. São Paulo: PAULUS, 2002.GLENN Jr., John D. The Definition of the Self and the Structure ofKierkegaard's Work. In.: Perkins, Robert L. (org.). InternationalKierkegaard Commentary: The Sickness Unto Death. Georgia:Mercer University Press, 1987.KIERKEGAARD, Søren. Concluding Unscientific Postscript.Edited and translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong.Princiton: Princiton University Press, 1992._____. Repetition and Philosophical Crumbs. Translated By M.G.Piety with an introduction by Edward F. Mooney and notes Edward F.Mooney and by M.G. Piety. New York: Oxford University Press._____. Temor e tremor. Tradução, introdução e notas por ElisabeteM. De Sousa. Lisboa: Relógio D'Água Editores, 2009._____. A Repetição. Tradução, introdução e notas por José MirandaJusto. Lisboa: Relógio D'Água Editores, 2009a._____. The Sickness Unto Death. Edited and translated withintroduction and notes by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. NewJersey: Princeton University Press, 1980.REICHMANN, Ernani. Kierkegaard. Paraná: Edições Jr., 1972.WATKIN, Julia. The A to Z of Kierkegaard's philosophy. Toronto:The Scarecrow Press, Inc., 2010.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.039 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".