MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614880481 · doi:10.1155/2017/3676474

Allied Health Professional Support in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Survey from the Canadian Children Inflammatory Bowel Disease Network—A Joint Partnership of CIHR and the CH.I.L.D. Foundation

2017· article· en· W2614880481 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Wael El‐Matary, Eric I. Benchimol, David Mack, Hien Q. Huynh, Jeff Critch, Anthony Otley, Colette Deslandres, Kevan Jacobson, Jennifer deBruyn, Matthew Carroll, Eytan Wine, Johan Van Limbergen, Mary Sherlock, Kevin Bax, Sally Lawrence, Ernest G. Seidman, Robert M. Issenman, Thomas D. Walters, Peter Church, Anne M. Griffiths

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoMontreal Children's HospitalWestern UniversityMcMaster Children's HospitalDalhousie UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreBC Children's HospitalJaneway Children's Health and Rehabilitation CentreUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryChildren's Hospital of Western OntarioChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMcGill UniversityUniversity of OttawaChildren's Hospital of Winnipeg
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaCanadian Association of GastroenterologyCanadian Child Health Clinician Scientist ProgramChildren's Hospital Foundation
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeDieticiansPediatric gastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseFamily medicineHealth careAmbulatoryAmbulatory careDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and HepatologySame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207